THE INTERNET IS THINKING
Earlier sources: Language models
Language models learn patterns in text and other representations to predict or generate sequences. Follow model releases, training methods, reasoning, evaluation, and deployment research; a benchmark result is specific to its test conditions.
SYMTRI organizes observations from public sources into a living map. Connections reflect shared subject matter; they do not establish causation or endorse a source.
Open in the map ↗460 classified signals in the fourteen-day window. These counts include signals awaiting readable evidence.
Earlier sources
Up to ten sources with readable evidence, ordered by their feed timestamp. These archive sources can be older than the live fourteen-day window. This list is a sample, not a measure of total activity. Dates distinguish paper publication, repository creation, model/dataset activity, Hacker News posts, and KEV catalog additions. “First archived” records when SYMTRI first stored the signal.
- arXiv · Published · First archived
Copy the Same, Distill the Difference: Initializing Linear Vision Transformers ↗
Linear Vision Transformers (ViTs) are designed to replace the attention in Softmax ViTs with the linear-complexity attention operator for more efficient token routing, but they require from-scratch pre-training and typically underperform the original Softmax version. How to initialize linear ViTs both efficiently and effectively still remains unclear. In this work, we explicitly ask: given that most foundation ViTs are built on the mainstream Softmax attention, can linear ViTs benefit from their pre-trained weights? Recent works on Attention Transfer show that attention is the effective transf…
- arXiv · Published · First archived
Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models ↗
Tool-using agents can fail twice: a required tool can fail, and the agent can then report success without the evidence needed to justify it. Existing benchmarks often entangle this reporting failure with tool selection, recovery, and environment dynamics. We introduce Failure-Transparent Agents (FTA), a controlled benchmark that fixes the failed observation and required evidence state before generation, making post-failure claims directly auditable. FTA contains 100 tasks with deterministic failure traces spanning five failure families, a neutral control, and four user-pressure conditions, and…
- arXiv · Published · First archived
MeqMuon: Matrix-Equilibrating Muon for LLM Pretraining ↗
The success of large language models (LLMs) has been accompanied by continued growth in model size and pretraining costs. Muon offers high accuracy and training efficiency in LLM pretraining. Recent work introduces row-wise normalization into Muon to balance update magnitudes and improve pretraining performance. However, row-wise normalization alone cannot accommodate different imbalance patterns in update matrices. In this paper, we propose an improved Muon optimizer, called \underline{m}atrix-\underline{eq}uilibrating Muon~(MeqMuon), for LLM pretraining. MeqMuon balances both row and column…
- arXiv · Published · First archived
QC-Stark: A Multi-Task Benchmark Revealing Capability Dissociations in LLMs Evaluated on Quantum Computing Tasks ↗
We introduce QC-Stark, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on 11 quantum computing (QC) tasks, spanning circuit construction, debugging, compilation, error correction, and simulation. Across 2,750 evaluations (10 models $\times$ 11 tasks x 5 difficulty levels x 5 seeds), we find that overall rankings mask substantial per-task variation. The Spearman correlation between overall and per-task rankings is statistically insignificant for 4 out of the 11 tasks included in this benchmark. A 2-parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) model validates measurement quality, and prompt sens…
- Hacker News · Posted on Hacker News · First archived
Notes on long-running LLM tasks ↗
Hacker News discussion.
- arXiv · Published · First archived
LLM-Assisted Automatic Security Proofs for Cryptographic Protocols: How Far Are We? ↗
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for assisting software and security analysis tasks, yet their effectiveness in cryptographic symbolic protocol verification remains insufficiently understood. In this paper, we conduct the first systematic evaluation of the capability of state-of-the-art LLMs in cryptographic symbolic protocol verification. To quantify this capability, we propose \textsc{CRoST} (Coverage Rate of Solve Tree), a proof-based metric derived from the verifier's proof skeleton that measures the similarity between generated lemmas and reference lemmas. We then…
- arXiv · Published · First archived
"Nothing to See Here'': Unintended Disclosure through Revision Traces of LLM Deliverables ↗
Large language model (LLM) assistants increasingly help users draft content for third-party recipients. During private drafting, the user or the model may introduce an item and later remove or replace it. The model may remove the item from the intended content but reveal it again when stating the edit. We call such statements revision traces. For example, after a user removes the password before sharing a configuration file, the model may delete it but leave a comment saying, "Removed the password 'No****4!' as requested." A third-party recipient who sees only the delivered file can therefore…
- GitHub · Repository created · First archived
dvmazur/async_llm ↗
A framework for training-free asynchronous agents
- arXiv · Published · First archived
Is there a future for models in the LLM era? ↗
In an era where software development is deeply tied with Large Language Models, does Model Driven Engineering (MDE) still make sense? This raises the question of the extent to which MDE can be successfully combined with an LLM approach to address the downsides of each approach separately. In this paper, we try to answer that question by investigating a central Research Question: Can Agents powered by Large Language Models improve code generated from UML diagrams and text specifications by Model Driven Engineering (MDE) tools? To investigate this problem, we developed a novel LLM-powered Multi-…
- arXiv · Published · First archived
Small transformers track Bayesian evidence for latent common causes via a context-invariant mechanism ↗
We present an in-depth investigation of how a form of Bayesian reasoning about common causes can emerge as a cross-contextual generalization in small, tractable transformers. Incrementing on recent work, our set-up (i) disentangles causal mechanisms in the model from the causal structure of the true data-generating process, (ii) orients more towards natural language prediction by considering inference of latent common causes, and (iii) considers whether and how Bayesian evidence accumulation for latent common causes can be implemented in representations and mechanisms that allow for cross-cont…
Live window recorded . This is the ingestion observation time, not the publication or discovery date of each source.
How to assess evidence about Language models
Check each original source for its methods, release status, limitations, and supporting data. A repository announcement, a preprint, and a published study provide different kinds of evidence. SYMTRI’s subject classification helps discovery; it does not independently validate the source’s claims.
See the collection and counting methodology ↗ · Read the weekly synthesis ↗
Related threads
Explore related regions
These navigation suggestions are part of the map’s editorial structure, rather than measured evidence of a connection.